LAB NOTES




 


PREVIOUS COLUMNS
 Asteroid collisions--how do they rate?
 Does Dolly have old age on the lamb?
 Have we lost The Right Stuff?
 Blue moons for a distant Jupiter?




Request a review

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions

Cryptozoology and the aliens of Earth


By Wil McCarthy

In the heavily forested Annamite Mountains straddling Vietnam and Laos, an alien species was discovered this summer by wildlife biologists. It's a rabbit. The animal is larger than the North American jackrabbit--closer in size to the European hare--and sports a coat of brightly striped fur. It is also just about as endagered as a species can get: restricted to a geographic area smaller than Baja, Calif., that serves as a hunting ground for hungry humans. One specimen was photographed alive by an automatic camera set up in the jungle, but several others were discovered, dead and gutted, in a Lak Xao village meat market.

By itself, this discovery is hardly going to change the course of history, but the compelling thing about it is that this is the fourth large mammal species discovered in the same region during the 1990s. The others are the "spidlehorn bovid" or "saola" in 1992, the "barking deer" or "giant muntjac" in 1994, and the "Vietnamese warty hog," also in 1994. Other surprising discoveries of recent decades include the Megamouth shark, in 1976 in the waters off Hawaii, the Chaocan Peccary, in 1975 in Paraguay, and the Indonesian Tree Kangaroo in 1993. I am not making these names up.

It just goes to show that even here at the end of the 20th century, the planet Earth is not completely explored. Forget the thousands or millions of uncataloged species of tiny insects and tinier bacteria and protozoa--there are still some rather large, rather obvious critters running (or hopping) around unseen beneath our very noses.

Fantastic animals

So if large animals--even our fellow mammals--can remain undiscovered right up to the Third Millennium, the next obvious question is: what other fantastic animals might we still hope to find? We can do more than speculate about this; most phenomena are well documented in rumor, myth, and innuendo long before they're confirmed scientifically. In fact, there is a whole field of study devoted to the investigation of strange animal sightings.

"Cryptozoology," as it's known, has a poor reputation in some circles, especially where it hazes into studies of the paranormal, but it's helpful to recall that at the start of this century, the Komodo dragon and mountain gorilla were just legends, and the coelacanth and Megamouth shark were thought to have been extinct since the time of the dinosaurs. And there should be large-animal cryptozoology work for at least another few decades, given the number of legendary animals we're still not sure about.

First and foremost among these are giant squids of the genus Archeteuthis. Once known only as the Kraken of Norse legend, these creatures are documented by juvenile corpses, adult tentacle fragments, and some truly enormous sucker marks on the bodies of sperm whales, which are the squids' enemies. Deep-dwelling Archeteuthis are sometimes thought to be a food supply for the whales, but eyewitness accounts of squid-initiated brawling suggest the predation may be mutual. The existence of these monsters is not in doubt, but since they've never been photographed alive, the open question is just exactly how big they really are. And since Archeteuthis are also known to attack both humans and boats, the folks who find out may not always come home to report it. Typical size estimates range to 30 meters or more, with isolated but credible reports of up to 60 meters--larger than an Olympic swimming pool. That's one mean mollusk!

On somewhat drier ground, the moors of England are home to a large predator known as the Beast of Bodmin, which has been killing livestock for many years. That a beast of some sort exists here is unquestionable; what remains to be discovered is what sort of beast it is, whether it's a single animal or a population, and whether it's indigenous or introduced. A puma or other large cat is considered the likeliest candidate, or possibly a wolf, but for now the enticing scent of mystery lingers in the air.

The Kraken and the Beast

If the Kraken and the Beast enjoy a near-100 percent chance of really existing, we can estimate, perhaps, a 40-50 percent chance for the lesser-known Tasmanian tiger, a marsupial predator named for its fierce disposition and brightly colored stripes. Once native to islands all around Australia, the species--also known as the Thylacine--was declared extinct in 1936, when its last member perished in a Tasmanian zoo. But in Tasmania, mainland Australia, and especially the jungled mountains of Indonesia, there are persistent reports of a very nasty doglike or foxlike creature capable of standing and hopping on its kangaroolike hind legs. No specimen has yet been captured, shot, or photographed, but these reports could well indicate pockets of Thylacine--or possibly some closely related species--still resident in the lands down under.

Edging down into less certain territory, we have the Yeti of the Himalayas and the Bigfoot or Sasquatch of North America. Could a larger-than-man-sized primate really roam the northern forests of Canada and the United States. or the mountain wastes of Nepal? In light of other cryptozoological surprises, it does begin to seem plausible. Still, the lack of reliable evidence after decades of determined searching puts my probability estimate at less than 20 percent. We'll see.

Even more speculative is the South American chupacabra, a small primate reputed to be both fiercer and more intelligent than monkeys. By itself this is credible enough, but since some legends describe the chupacabra as wearing hats and even full suits of clothing, this may be more of a leprechaun or goblin than an actual animal. However, the easy out for cryptozoologists is to discover a new primate species in South America--any primate species--and declare it to be the chupacabra of legend. There's probably a solid 10 percent chance that this will happen sometime in the next decade or two, assuming the entire rain forest isn't denuded before then.

Will we find Nessie?

And what of everyone's favorite X-creature, the Loch Ness Monster? Alas, the dozens of well-planned, well-equipped, well-financed hunting expeditions have failed to turn up anything more solid than a few image enhancement artifacts, like the animal shapes you see in clouds even when you know there's no animal there. I'd put the odds of Nessie--and her dozens of fellow lake monsters around the world--at less than 1 percent.

But don't take my word for it--in 1930 I'd probably have said the same thing about the coelocanth.


Wil McCarthy is a rocket guidance engineer, robot designer, science fiction author and occasional aquanaut. He has contributed to three interplanetary spacecraft, five communication and weather satellites, a line of landmine-clearing robots, and some other "really cool stuff" he can't tell us about. His short fiction has graced the pages of Analog, Asimov's, SF Age and other major markets, and his novel-length works include Aggressor Six, the New York Times Notable Bloom, and upcoming The Collapsium.




Home

News of the Week | On Screen | Off the Shelf | Classics
Anime | Sound Space | Site of the Week | Letters | Lab Notes


Copyright © 1998-2003, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.