Excessive Candour


  Excessive Candour
PREVIOUS COLUMNS
 On Blue's Waters
 All Tomorrow's Parties
 Half Life
 Ender's Shadow
 The Rift
 When We Were Real
 Darwin's Radio
 The Dictionary of Science Fiction Places
 A Deepness in the Sky
 The Dragons of Springplace
 The Good New Stuff
 The Twinkling of an Eye
 The Good Old Stuff
 The Golden Globe
 The Dreams Our Stuff Is Made Of
 Black Glass
 Six Moon Dance
 Darwinia
 Weird Women, Wired Women
 Girl in Landscape
 The Smithsonian Institution
 Moonfall
 The Sparrow; Children of God
 Cosm
 To Say Nothing of the Dog
 The Calcutta Chromosome
 Expendable
 The Rise of Endymion
 Jack Faust, A Geography of Unknown Lands
 Destiny's Road
 Eternity Road
 Lives of the Monster Dogs
 God's Fire




Request a review

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions

I hear something turning in the grave


By John Clute

The first decision this reviewer made on starting to read Pat Murphy's giggly new novel was not to think about the grave of J.R.R. Tolkien and him turning in it. This saved a lot of useless ponder time. There and Back Again has about as much to do with The Hobbit: Or, There and Back Again (1937) as "What I Did on My Summer Vacation" by A. Child has to do with The Book of Job.

Something must be said about the connection, all the same.

The Hobbit is both sombre and hilarious; There and Back Again is neither. In The Hobbit, Tolkien (most clearly in the revised editions from 1951 on) hints at moral issues bigger than Bilbo can grasp, and makes sure we understand that most (if not all) the named characters in the story are deeper and darker than they first seemed. In There and Back Again, Murphy utters a few sage comments on the value of friends, and makes sure that all the named characters in the story turn out nicer and more huggable than we could have first thought they were.

But There and Back Again does have a story of its own, told by Pat Murphy pretending to write in collaboration with a certain Max Merriwell, whose photograph on the back flap uncannily resembles Pat Murphy wearing a small mop on her chin, or perhaps Shirley Temple wearing a small mop on her chin. Max Merriwell (whose name above the mop uncannily evokes one of Frodo's pals) does not, in other words, exist. But the book does. So back to it.

Wormholes and pirates

Here we go. We are in a space opera universe, with miners in space and wormholes and pirates and clones and Resurrectionists (who use clones for spare parts) and a female fighter cyborg who is an ace pilot and pataphysicians (a nice touch) and a hauntingly wise museum curator whose name (we learn at the end of the book) is Pat Murphy and colonists and more usual suspects.

The tale starts in our own solar system's asteroid belt, which is owned by a tribe of short plump humans who call themselves norbits (from trying to say "in orbit" when you're drunk) and inhabit cozy cave-like hollowed-out asteroids. The nicest and laziest and plumpest of these norbits is a middle-aged scavenger farmer named Bailey (from trying to say "Bilbo" with a mop in your mouth) who wants nothing better than to make his garden grow. Gitana has other ideas.

Gitana is a tall female who looks like she might be from Old Earth. She tells Bailey that the Farr family, female clones who have made their fortune identifying wormhole routes (a neat play on dwarf miners) through the galaxy, is coming to have dinner. It turns out that he has scavenged a message pod which contains a call for help from a far-flung Farr who may have discovered a mother lode of holograph wormhole maps.

From this point, we know the rest.

Edgy clone friends

Bailey and the Farr clones and Gitana go on a great adventure to find the wormhole map in a cave at the centre of the galaxy. They undergo an assortment of adventures, picking up friends and enemies as they go. Bailey is beleaguered briefly by a demented creature half-dismembered by a mad Resurrectionist; the creature has lost its Moebius-strip bracelet, which allows its bearer to make time go fast or slow around him, and thinks (rightly) Bailey may have absconded with it. Indeed, he uses it to escape the gollum, which is the last we see of the gollum (this is a nice book).

Again and again he uses his Moebius-strip bracelet (hence Ring) to get himself and his edgy clone friends out of various jams, as they progress by easy wormhole stages to the Heart of the Galaxy, where a small moon, hollowed out aeons past by the Old Ones, contains a great hoard of maps.

But the moon is guarded by what the cast calls a Boojum (quatrains from Lewis Carroll's The Hunting of the Snark (1876) have headed each chapter of There and Back Again) but which is in fact a robot defense device of the Old Ones. Not until a great assortment of pirates and clones and colonists and pataphysicians and cyborgs and Bailey himself join forces can first the Boojum, and afterwards several shiploads of unnamed Resurrectionists, be defeated.

Bailey then takes his Ring back home.

Why parody Tolkien?

It's a story which, pumped up to its regulation 300 pages, is very little more complicated than this synopsis. Why then is there such a to-do about the thing? Why Lewis Carroll (whose great nonsense poem says exactly the reverse of anything Tolkien might have said about the meaning of the quest in life or literature)? Why the author's note at the end explicitly and rather portentously tying the plot of There and Back Again to the myth of the hero expounded by Joseph Campbell in The Hero With a Thousand Faces (1949)? Why parody Tolkien at all if you don't mean it?--after all, no discernible lesson has been extracted from any of the parallels between model and mock.

And why Max Merriwell? And if Max Merriwell is actually meant to be a pseudonym (that is, a disguise), why blow his cover for the book on the very cover of the book?

And why a Ring which does its bearer nothing but good? Tolkien's Ring, even in The Hobbit, is anything but a free lunch. Tolkien's Ring (and Wagner's) say to their bearers: Do what you will. Then pay for it. Murphy's Ring says: Do what you will. Because you are nice.

But hey, why so heavy. Isn't Pat Max Murphy Merriwell just having some harmless retro fun, here at the end of the century, looking back indulgently to the days when stories meant? There and Back Again is just a game, right?

Right.

Right right right.

But I hear something turning in the grave.


John Clute is a writer, editor, critic and scholar of science fiction. He is the author of Science Fiction: The Illustrated Encyclopedia and co-editor of both The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and The Encyclopedia of Fantasy, all Hugo Award winners. His criticism and reviews have appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Omni, The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, and other places too numerous to list; much of this material has been collected in Strokes: Reviews and Essays 1966-1986 and Look at the Evidence: Reviews and Essays.




Home

News of the Week | On Screen | Off the Shelf | Games | Anime
Sound Space | Site of the Week | Letters | Excessive Candour


Copyright © 1998-2003, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.