INTERVIEW




 


RECENT INTERVIEWS
 Jason Katims
 Gregory Benford
 Glen Morgan, James Wong, Ali Larter, Kristen Cloke and Kerr Smith
 Gary Sinise
 Marc Blucas
 George Takei
 Vin Diesel
 William Gibson
 James Wong
 Rob Tapert




Request a review

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions


Ahmed Best captures Jar Jar Binks


By Melissa J. Perenson

Even if you managed to miss the Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace juggernaut nearly a year ago, chances are you've heard of Jar Jar Binks. Jar Jar, of course, is a fully digitized character, created entirely in the computers at Industrial Light and Magic. Chances are equally as good that you haven't heard of Jar Jar's human alter-ego, Ahmed Best, the actor who supplied the voice and movements of the bumbling, floppy-eared alien.

While Jar Jar represented a groundbreaking digital triumph (Oscar snub notwithstanding), the character quickly proved to be controversial as well. Irked by Jar Jar's ubiquitous presence and pseudo-pidgin English accent, passionate viewers flocked to join Jar Jar hate brigades, and critics blasted Lucasfilm for racism.

Not that Best has let any of that get to him. On deck this summer to reprise his role as Jar Jar in Episode II, Best is currently pursuing his music career. Here, he takes time to set the record straight about Jar Jar.


Did you have any idea what it would involve to play Jar Jar?

 Best: No. This was like the first time in the history of movies that anyone had ever done something like this, so no one had any idea--most of all me. It was my first film, and I had no idea what was going to happen.


How did Industrial Light and Magic duplicate your motions for Jar Jar?

Best: I wore what was called a motion capture suit, which was like a tight scuba suit with a whole bunch of light sensors on it. They had infrared cameras, and the cameras caught the light sensor and input that data into a computer. And that data was my movement and how the light sensors moved and how they captured the data onto the computer. It was really quite fascinating. I had never done any of that before either.

Pretty much everything that they wanted, I did in a way. I probably did more than what they wanted, because there was a lot of stuff that I did that didn't even show up [in the film].


Did you have to essentially do twice as much work, since you were on set as well as recording the motion capture elements during post-production?

Best: Yeah. I did double everything. I was there on the set, and then I went to San Francisco and did probably about a year and a half's worth of more shooting for motion capture and animation.


Ever get tired of the repetitive grind?

Best: Nah. It's Star Wars. You can't really get tired of it.


What was your favorite part of The Phantom Menace?

Best: I dug all the fighting, like the saber fights. The thing I liked the most was the way Ray [Park] was moving, and the way they captured the lightsaber movement and the dynamics of it. It's really hard for me to look at myself and say, wow, I really enjoyed what I did at that part. Most of the stuff I [liked] came from the dialogue and the interactions with the other characters, rather than any action.


Were you surprised by the groundswell of anti-Jar Jar reaction?

Best: The majority of it was distorted. We approached the character with such innocence, and it's amazing how [vitriolic the response was]. It pretty much only happened in America; everywhere else in the world, it was no big deal. And things like seeing a completely innocent, docile cartoon character as something to be hated and despised [point to a bigger] problem within the American quote-unquote psyche. We're focusing so much on kill, die, and then we're wondering why people go crazy, why people shoot people, why people have no regard for human life, and yet--and still--the things that are being sensationalized are the things that glorify killing, shooting, maiming and destruction. Rather than say "Die, Jar Jar Binks," say, "Well, personally I didn't like the character, but hey, it was a good job, at least I believed it" [laughs].


Were you bothered by the negativity?

Best: No, of course not; it doesn't bother me that people are stupid. I'm not stupid.


Do you ever feel the need to defend Jar Jar?

Best: No. My voice isn't as strong as his. My power isn't as strong as his. I'm going to move on and do other things. My life isn't going to be about Jar Jar Binks.


Are you going to be a part of Episode II?

Best: So far it looks like it's going all right. They say I am, so I can only go by what they say. I hope I am. It definitely will be a great experience again. It looks good. That's about as deep as I can go.


What's been the hardest thing about finding film work in the wake of the Jar Jar experience?

Best: People didn't know there was somebody in the Jar Jar persona; they just thought it was only the magic of ILM. So they didn't realize I had a major part in it. And in the movie world, it's really important for people to see your face, and obviously they did not do that in Star Wars, so the work that I did was overshadowed by the fact that you could not see my face. [Acting] is more about image, and my image is not really in the public [mind]--but Jar Jar is.


What did you take away from the experience of doing Episode I?

Best: A lot. There's not one thing; there are so many things. There was a lot of hard work, and a lot of attention to detail. If there was one thing that I took away, it was paying attention to every single solitary detail, no matter how big or small. Everything you saw up on that screen was there for a reason. There was nothing wasted. Not a single color, not a single creature. Every single creature in that movie had a name, not just a species name, but a personal name--it was that well thought out.


What are you working on now?

Best: I'm recording another demo for another batch of record labels that we'll shop it around to. I've been going out on auditions, but it's hard if you don't have a certain image. We like to think of film and music as art, but actually art is something that is not restricted. And right now, in order to be lucrative in this business you have to be conservative; it's hard to be an artist and be conservative--at least, it is for me, personally.




Home

News of the Week | On Screen | Off the Shelf | Classics
Cool Stuff | Games | Site of the Week | Letters | Interview


Copyright © 1998-2006, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.