scifi.com navigationscifi.comnewsletterdownloadsfeedbacksearchfaqbboardscifi weeklyscifi wireschedulemoviesshows
RECENT REVIEWS
 Homeworld: Cataclysm
 Judge Dredd CCG
 Starship Troopers
 The World Is Not Enough
 Zeus: Master of Olympus
 Star Wars RPG
 Terminator CCG
 Dungeons & Dragons
 Star Trek: Voyager - Elite Force
 Tribbles Customizable Card Game


Request a review

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions


Star Trek: New Worlds

An explosion in space reveals New Worlds to conquer in Star Trek's war-torn universe

* Star Trek: New Worlds
* By Interplay
* Windows 95 with DirectX 6.1
* Pentium II 300 MHz
* 64 MB RAM
* 16 MB DirectX certified hardware video accelerator
* 100% DirectX compatible sound card
* MSRP: $29.95

Review by Mark H. Walker

P icking up where Star Trek V: The Final Frontier left off, Star Trek: New Worlds takes those familiar powers--the Federation, the Klingons and the Romulans--into new conflicts. In 2292, the Romulans, using an experimental weapon, have torn the fabric of empty space. The blast has revealed a new system of planets rich in minerals. These new worlds are the stage for an explosive colonization race.

Our Pick: B

Like many real-time titles, the game mixes resource management with unit production and blazingly fast combat. Players control any of the three empires mentioned above in both campaign and multiplayer exploits. The Taubat, a people native to the newly created Tabula Rasa region, have pivotal interactions with each player-controlled civilization but are not under the gamer's domain. Each empire's vehicles and buildings have a different look, but the tech trees for all three remain similar.

Despite the semblance in upgrades and unit behavior, the plot and style of play differ with each civilization. Specifically, each race represents a different campaign and difficulty level. The Klingons are recommended for novices, the Federation for average skilled players and the Romulans for experts. The 14-mission campaigns are tailored to each civilization's differing genetic tendencies. For example, the Klingons' mission objectives are more aggressive than those of the passive do-gooders of the Federation.

Some real-time strategy (RTS) titles carry a steep learning curve, and Star Trek: New Worlds is no exception. The game's plethora of camera angles, varying civilization playing styles and use of personnel management require players to spend quite a bit of time acquainting themselves with the system. Luckily, the game comes with a detailed in-game tutorial and a 136-page instruction manual, complete with unit profiles, staff and crew operating strategies and troubleshooting tips.

Out-of-this-Worlds graphics

Although Star Trek: New Worlds does little to boldly go where no RTS title has gone before, it's indeed a quality title with plenty to offer Trekkers and RTS fans alike. Despite some poor design decisions, New Worlds is a fun, graphically beautiful romp through a small corner of the Star Trek universe. Developer 14 Degrees East (Starfleet Command, M.A.X. 2), has once again put together a solid dose of strategy gaming.

Undoubtedly, the game's accelerated graphics, enhanced by a complex 3-D camera system, steal the show. Both planet terrain and atmosphere are portrayed in rich detail, providing each Tabula Rasa planet with a distinct personality--icy cliffs tower above the horizon, scenic lakes sprawl beneath violent electrical storms, and steamy geysers dot the landscape. Unfortunately, the vehicles come across as box-like minivans rather than menacing warlike forms. Nevertheless, Star Trek: New Worlds' graphics are among the top tier of RTS games.

An absorbing story adds to the title's atmosphere. Each empire's philosophy is superbly accentuated in the campaign missions. Moreover, the Taubat's strange religious beliefs, a plague infesting Tabula Rasa natives and internal strife within the Romulan kingdom make an interesting backdrop to the objectives.

New World's gameplay is not perfect, but what--Sandra Bullock aside--is? Nonetheless, the game does a lot of things right. The floating camera (standard fare in most 3-D RTS games) is top-notch, and includes adjustable first-person and isometric camera views, as well as a tricorder map. These views are confusing at first, but, once mastered, prove quite useful. Playbook commands, such as "Move without Attacking" and "Return to Vehicle Rally Point," minimize unit micromanaging. Unfortunately, you cannot order your troops while the game is paused--a serious design flaw--and there is no in-mission save feature. Didn't these folks read the MechCommander reviews?

Yet none of these flaws are showstoppers. Yep, the tanks could have looked more tank-like, and the game needs both order-while-paused and in-mission saves, but nonetheless, this is good, solid RTS fun.

The game has a great look and feel. It's sure to draw in science fiction fans with its cool effects and nifty campaign story. -- Mark

Back to the top.




Home

News of the Week | On Screen | Off the Shelf | Games | Sound Space
Anime | Site of the Week | Interview | Letters | Lab Notes


Copyright © 1998-2006, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.