people's choice listing that polled about 3,000 movie fans to build its listing of dubious winners, this tribute to The Golden Turkey is yet another Web site dedicated to cataloging just how bad things can get in the world of film. Want to know who was chosen as worst actress over the course of her
career? The poll results on which movie features the worst romantic dialogue ever? All these factsand many moreare showcased on this devoted and well-organized fan site.
The Golden Turkey Awards doesn't offer just one or two standard categories of awfulness, though it does cover obligatory subjects like Worst Film Ever (Plan Nine from Outer Space) and Worst Title (Rat Fink a Go Go). No, these prizes have been selected in many an esoteric category: Most Ridiculous Monster, Most Obnoxious Child Performer, Worst Vegetable Movie and Worst Performance by a Popular Singer. Though the site is not devoted exclusively to SF films, the nature of many of these award classes make genre pictures the obvious selections.
As a Web tribute to The Golden Turkeywhich existed, originally, in the form of a 1978 bookthe site lists not only the winners of each award but all of the major nominees, with each section offering photos, dates of production and further opinions by webmaster Andre Vandal on whether the award was deserved or other possibilities were overlooked.
The Web page also offers a challenge to students of film history: One of the movies mentioned on the site never existed. The original creators of the award invented a lone false film to see if visitors could spot their fake among the various howlers their readers had suggested as Turkey candidates. The ringer is buried in the Golden Turkey Awards site somewhere, just waiting for dedicated film buffs to discover it.
A.M. Dellamonica
Site of the WeekFebruary 18, 2003
urrently, the publisher Ace Books is celebrating its 50th anniversary, and continuing to issue important works in the science-fiction and fantasy field. But to many avid collectors of vintage paperbacks, Ace Books is known mainly for one rather odd invention in the history of book production: the Ace Double. These push-me-pull-you contrivances were two separate novels (or short-story collections, or a mix of novel and collection, or even non-fiction works) bound in the same package, back to back and upside down to each other. The lifespan of the Ace Double in all its various incarnations was 21 years, and anyone who grew up reading SF in the '50s, '60s and '70s will have fond memories of purchasing masterpieces such as Delany's Fall of the Towers trilogy and various Philip K. Dick mind-bogglers in Ace Double form. And of course, throughout this period, Ace also released many important books in more traditional singleton format.
All this marvelous history is on display at Michael Smith's The Ace Doubles (And Singles): Image Library, a visual treasure trove of cover art, buttressed by some intermittent yet thoughtful and vital text. Upon first reaching the site, the viewer is given a brief history of Ace's glory days, and then invited to view thumbnails from the ranks of either the doubles or the singles. Within these two major divisions, the categories of "Science Fiction," "Mystery," "Western" or "Potpourri" are further distinguished. Once a choice is made, the books appear in ascending order by serial number. Clicking on a number (unique to each side of a double) brings up the appropriate cover art. And what a parade of pulp beauty is on display! Covers by such famous artists as Valigursky and Emsh are rivaled only by the melodramatic inimitable one-sentence blurbs, many of them coined by Ace's legendary editor Donald Wollheim. This archive represents the core of SF over several decades, and if you can't afford Ace Double D-36, the famous edition of Robert E. Howard's Conan the Conqueror, at least you can admire it here.
Smith very helpfully lists the contents of almost all of the short-story collections. He comments on individual covers, such as that for K-175, Virginia Coffman's Moura, a Gothic romance which violates artistic conventions by having two women instead of one on the cover (and in a somewhat suspect clinch at that!). And he provides links to sites where the dedicated fan can purchase printed checklists of all Ace publications. But the reader should be warned: This site can induce intense jealousy and covetousness. I want my copy of Robert Bloch's The Will to Kill right now, to answer the question "Was he to be 'Jack the Ripper' all over again?"
Paul Di Filippo
Site of the WeekFebruary 10, 2003
mad scientist's view on other mad scientists" is the bold claim of this site, which reviews cult SF movies at great and interesting length. Visitors should not view this claim too narrowly, though, because while there are over 200 film reviews on this Web page, the movies covered range widely across the spectrum of the fantastic, with plenty of coverage of horror films and Hong Kong supernatural adventures.
What does that mean? Merely that while the films chosen for review run the gamut from The Secret of Roan Inish to Robocop, leaving out more than a few mad-scientist classicsFrankenstein, for examplethe site is not an exhaustive listing of mad-science movies. Instead, its reviews place an enjoyable emphasis on filmmakers' often paranoid treatment of the discipline of science.
And You Call Yourself a Scientist? reprints a number of real-world science articles and offers two collections of science-related dialogue snippets from movies and television programs. The page also lists potentially embarrassing horror films made by stars like John Travolta, Ray Liotta, Meg Ryan and Brad Pitt when theyand their careerswere young and fragile.
Getting to all this top-notch content is sometimes difficult, because the site is laid out in a chaotic fashion that makes it hard to navigate. Even so, its many joysfrom a "Fish Without a Bicycle" section (covering movies about all-female societies and organizations) to the reviews themselvesmake for intriguing reading and a lot of fun.
A.M. Dellamonica
Back to the top.