scifi.com navigationscifi.comnewsletterdownloadsfeedbacksearchfaqbboardscifi weeklyscifi wireschedulemoviesshows
 
From the Editor



RECENT EDITORIALS
 Mammoth, Thrilling and Wrong
 The House That Jack Built
 A Zone as Vast as Space, A Twilight as Timeless as Infinity
 Things That Are Easy and Things That Are Hard
 Giving Birth to Tomorrow's Broken Promises
 90 Miles and a Million Light Years From Home
 Still Dangerous After All These Years
 Finding Solace in Science Fiction
 Pixels, Patience and Professionalism
 Worldcons Future, Worldcons Past
 Making Peace with My Cyborg Future
 Variety is the Price of Life
 One Zings, the Other Doesn't
 To Serve Science Fiction
 A Quisling Quakes at the Oscars
 I Read the News Today, Oh Boy
 Living in the Future of the Past
 The Persistence of Visions
 It Really Is a Small World After All
 Never Confuse the Bottle with the Wine
 Hope Springs Eternal on the Galapagos Islands
 Looking at the World with Alien Eyes
 Now We Are Six
 Why Harlan Ellison is Essential
 You Launch My Rocket, I'll Launch Yours
 Science Fiction Is Supposed to Be Fun
 Longing to Live in Ray Bradbury's Toy Store
 Yesterday's News Makes Tomorrow Uncertain
 Celebrating Science Fiction's Living National Treasure
 Paper and the Myth of Permanence
 Three Novels That Changed A Life
 The war between the SF and mundane worlds is over--and guess who won?
 Please Don't Hate Us Because We're Science Fictional
 Learning to Live a Science Fictional Life




Request a review

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions


Give 'Em the Old Razzle-Dazzle


By Scott Edelman

)e're an awfully jaded people, those of us seeking entertainment here at the beginning of what comparatively speaking is still a brand-spanking-new millennium. At one time, looking up at the stars and picking out the shapes of gods and animals was enough to fill our minds with dreams. But these days, it seems that we only pay attention to space when a disaster rubs our collective noses in it. And as for being inspired by spectacle, some of us even look at the state-of-the-art, bullet-time effects of The Matrix Reloaded and yawn. "Been there," we say. "Done that. Can't you do better?" We're surrounded by bread and circuses so Brobdingnagian that they would blow the mind of an average Roman, and yet, for denizens of the year 2003, often ... it just isn't enough.

I'm just as guilty of this sort of ingratitude of the imagination as anyone else. I eagerly went to see The Matrix Reloaded, hoping that it would have the same powerful effect on me as did the first film, but unfortunately, it just ... didn't. Yes, I was entertained, and yes, the thrill of watching Neo battle dozens of Agent Smiths could not be denied. And yet—the element of something new and unknown was missing, and there were times when I shifted uncomfortably in my seat, waiting for the talking to end and for the movie to just get on with it, to show me something larger, something louder, something just a little bit more impossible.

That scared me. In speaking with others, I've learned that I'm not the only one to come away undazzled. And so, I wonder—Is that what we've come to? Have we developed some strange sort of attention-deficit disorder of the soul?

Bigger bangs await us in theaters in the near future—the trailers for T3: Rise of the Machines and Freddy vs. Jason that shared the screen with Keanu held out the promise of more extravagant stunts and even bigger scares. But still, I worried.

What if my appetite for fantastic images should increase at a greater rate than the world's ability to satisfy them? Would I—would all of us—be fated to live forever hungry?

That was now, this is then

Were our parents like this? Or our grandparents and their grandparents before them? I tried to sort all that out recently when I visited Baltimore's American Dime Museum. The American Dime Museum is dedicated to preserving the relics of those sideshows of curiosities that toured the country from the mid-19th century until they were put out of business by more modern entertainments. The museum's collection is overflowing with thousands of phantasmagorical historical artifacts, some of which were real (a la a miniature mansion built of matchsticks) and some of which only purported to be real (such as the preserved body of a captured sea serpent).

In a glass case along one wall stretches what was originally ballyhooed as a "Mummified Indian Woman and Child 6,000 Years Old," quite an exaggeration for something made 100 years or so ago of sawdust and plaster. Hanging at eye level is a fish covered with dubious white feathers, a mutation supposedly brought on by its need to survive in deep icy waters. In the day when these items were still new, carnival barkers would keep them carefully hidden, and then use their most persuasive patter to convince gullible customers to plunk their dimes down for a glimpse, a lesson—to sell the sizzle more than the steak—that Hollywood's hucksters have never forgotten.

Since we now clearly see these manufactured marvels as hoaxes, you might be tempted to laugh at those ancestors of ours who could once have been captivated and deceived by such an assortment of oddities. And while it's true that is one of the possible side effects of visiting, there's more to be gained at the American Dime Museum than a sense of smugness. Take a moment to imagine the audience for these strange objects. Envision the world in which they lived. If you find yourself able to get into the right frame of mind, then the sawdust turns to wonder.

Earth was a smaller globe then. Maps may not have had "Here There Be Dragons" inscribed at their corners any longer, but there was still a great deal humanity did not know. It was a far easier era in which to be shocked and amazed, a time without radio, television or the Internet. When confronted with this sort of concrete evidence of unexplained phenomena, it was far easier to be dazzled. Who knew what mysteries and wonders might lie on the other side of the planet, when so few had seen it?

As far as our ancestors were concerned, sideshows such as these delivered to their generation all the spectacle and wonder that The Matrix Reloaded promised to ours.

And who's to say which of us is better off?


Scott Edelman started his trek to the editor-in-chief position at Science Fiction Weekly decades ago, when he began working as an assistant editor at Marvel Comics. Between these two positions, this four-time Hugo Award nominee in the category of Best Editor was the founding editor of the award-winning magazine Science Fiction Age, in addition to editing Sci-Fi Universe, Sci-Fi Flix and Satellite Orbit. Currently, he also edits SCI FI, the official magazine of the SCI FI Channel. His short stories can be found in the recent anthologies Angel Body and other Magic for the Soul and The Book of More Flesh.







Home

News of the Week | On Screen | Off the Shelf | Classics
Cool Stuff | Games | Site of the Week | Letters | Interview


Copyright © 1998-2006, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.