scifi.com navigationscifi.comnewsletterdownloadsfeedbacksearchfaqbboardscifi weeklyscifi wireschedulemoviesshows
 
From the Editor



RECENT EDITORIALS
 Why Can't We Be Friends?
 The Times They Are A-Changin'
 Who's Serving Whom?
 The Lord of the Oscars
 Storming the Fortress With a Confusion of Critics
 The Return of the Guilt
 Five Things I Won't Have to Think About in 2004
 Never Have So Many Waited So Long For So Little
 Something Impossible This Way Comes
 What I Did on My Summer Vacation
 California Dreamin'
 Caring About Clarion
 Facing Front and Believing True
 Give 'Em the Old Razzle-Dazzle
 Mammoth, Thrilling and Wrong
 The House That Jack Built
 A Zone as Vast as Space, A Twilight as Timeless as Infinity
 Things That Are Easy and Things That Are Hard
 Giving Birth to Tomorrow's Broken Promises
 90 Miles and a Million Light Years From Home
 Still Dangerous After All These Years
 Finding Solace in Science Fiction
 Pixels, Patience and Professionalism
 Worldcons Future, Worldcons Past
 Making Peace with My Cyborg Future
 Variety is the Price of Life
 One Zings, the Other Doesn't
 To Serve Science Fiction
 A Quisling Quakes at the Oscars
 I Read the News Today, Oh Boy
 Living in the Future of the Past
 The Persistence of Visions
 It Really Is a Small World After All
 Never Confuse the Bottle with the Wine
 Hope Springs Eternal on the Galapagos Islands
 Looking at the World with Alien Eyes
 Now We Are Six
 Why Harlan Ellison is Essential
 You Launch My Rocket, I'll Launch Yours
 Science Fiction Is Supposed to Be Fun
 Longing to Live in Ray Bradbury's Toy Store
 Yesterday's News Makes Tomorrow Uncertain
 Celebrating Science Fiction's Living National Treasure
 Paper and the Myth of Permanence
 Three Novels That Changed A Life
 The war between the SF and mundane worlds is over--and guess who won?
 Please Don't Hate Us Because We're Science Fictional
 Learning to Live a Science Fictional Life




Request a review

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions


Finding the Other Nemo


By Scott Edelman

Many of you, reading the title above, will probably think, "What other Nemo?" I'm sure that some of you may immediately know which Nemo I'm referring to, but others will recall only the orphaned clownfish who starred in the 2003 Pixar film Finding Nemo. So let me explain, because it's important to remember that without that first Nemo, the more recent one would not exist—and a good case could be made that neither would any of the other animated films we've been enjoying since the start of the cinema.

editorial1.jpg

The original Nemo was the creation of cartoonist Winsor McCay, born in 1869, who honed his artistic talent drawing posters for traveling circuses and dime museums. He went on to create the comic strips Little Sammy Sneeze and Dreams of the Rarebit Fiend, but the character for which he is most remembered is Little Nemo in Slumberland, who made his first appearance nearly a century ago in the Oct. 15, 1905, edition of the New York Herald. Each episode—in a large ornate, magnificently executed page that is heartbreaking to consider in these days of ever-shrinking Sunday comics sections—the sleeping child would have a surreal adventure in his dreaming wonderland, yet always return to reality in the last panel.

Little Nemo's connection with science fiction cannot be denied. Joe Shuster, the artist who, with his writer friend Jerry Siegel, created the world's most famous alien, Superman, credits the strip with inspiring him to draw fantastic comics of his own. Of all the comic strips he read as a child, he has said, "My sharpest memory is of Little Nemo. It was a very imaginative strip, and it even had a touch of science fiction in it. It had marvelous scenes—Winsor McCay's depiction of the city of the future, the planets, all the things I loved. That was among the things that turned me on to fantasy and science fiction."

McCay, who was already enormously successful as a cartoonist, was not content to let his creations stay motionless on newsprint. For years, he worked a vaudeville act with a chalkboard, entertaining audiences with speed-drawing accompanied by comic patter. Eventually, he created a new art form when (and this might be apocryphal) McCay made a bet with a fellow cartoonist that he could cause his most famous creation to move upon the screen. To accomplish this, McCay did what no sane animator today would dream of doing. In 1911, he painstakingly made 4,000 different drawings of Little Nemo and his friends. He photographed each one and then hand-colored the print. With that, McCay became, as he was to bill himself on later films, the "Inventor of the Animated Drawing." (To contrast, Walt Disney's first films were still a decade away, and Steamboat Willie, the short that introduced Mickey Mouse, wasn't to premiere until 1928.)

Founder of a club of idiots

In 1914, McCay took the new medium even further and animated Gertie the Dinosaur using an astonishing 10,000 drawings—and in the days before cel animation this meant that he had to draw the same background 10,000 times! McCay even incorporated this cartoon into his vaudeville act. He would stand by the screen and order the cheery dinosaur to obey his commands, at one point stepping off the stage and into the cartoon itself, to be carried around in Gertie's mouth.

editorial2.jpg

I'd been hearing about these early animated films since I was a kid, but I never had a chance to see them myself until I received a copy of Image Entertainment's recent DVD release of Winsor McCay's The Master Edition. Its Little Nemo was taken from the only 35mm print in existence, and its Gertie was lovingly restored from four prints. The DVD, which contains every film by McCay that has survived, must be seen to appreciate how far we have come and whose shoulders it is on which modern animation stands. In an era when teams of hundreds of animators create our current cinematic dreams, the thought of one dedicated artist hunched over a drawing board seems almost as prehistoric as Gertie herself. And yet that's just what began the march to today, not just toward this century's Nemo, but to all of the effects-laden movies of our time.

In 1926, McCay wrote to a friend, "The greatest contributing factor to my success was an absolute craving to draw pictures all the time," and for McCay it was indeed the art, not the business, that came first. Famed caracturist Al Hirschfeld once reported an anecdote told to him by George W. Bonty, the art director of the newspaper in which Little Nemo in Slumberland had made its first appearance. After Bonty saw McCay's initial animated cartoon, the man pleaded with McCay to patent his art form of the animated film before anyone else jumped in to exploit it. McCay supposedly replied, "Any idiot that wants to make a couple of thousand drawings for a hundred feet of film is welcome to join the club."

And what a club it has turned out to be ...

Imagine that—the man who predated Disney, and who perhaps could have been Disney had he so desired, instead chose not to be. He decided instead to return to his newspaper strips, which continue to be honored long after his lifetime. (For example, in 1995, Little Nemo even appeared on a United States postage stamp.) So as you head to the theater to see your next animated film, or prepare to pop Finding Nemo into the DVD player one more time, pause for a moment to remember the man who first showed that it could be done, one drawing at a time.


Scott Edelman started his trek to the editor-in-chief position at Science Fiction Weekly decades ago, when he began working as an assistant editor at Marvel Comics. Between these two positions, this four-time Hugo Award nominee in the category of Best Editor was the founding editor of the award-winning magazine Science Fiction Age, in addition to editing Sci-Fi Universe, Sci-Fi Flix and Satellite Orbit. Currently, he also edits SCI FI, the official magazine of the SCI FI Channel. His most recent short story appears in the new anthology Quietly Now: A Tribute to Charles L. Grant.







Home

News of the Week | On Screen | Off the Shelf | Classics
Cool Stuff | Games | Site of the Week | Letters | Interview


Copyright © 1998-2006, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.