The Letters to the Editor department is intended to be a forum for our readers to express their own opinions and ideas. While we appreciate the many complimentary letters we receive each day, you won't find them on this page. Instead, you will find letters that go beyond or even contradict what we have written, letters that offer a different perspective and provide a different view of science fiction.
Scott Edelman, Editor-in-Chief
Send us your letters!
Got a gripe about something going on in the science fiction world? Want to call attention to an overlooked genre gem? Do you disagree with one of our reviews? Would you like to tell the editor of Science Fiction Weekly what a great job he does? Write a letter to the editor and send it in! You'll have the satisfaction of knowing that your letter will be read by thousands of SF fans. Doubtless, fame and fortune will follow (fame and fortune not guaranteed). If you would like to submit a letter, please send a message to scifiweekly@scifi.com.
ifteen years ago, I attended my first Star Trek convention at a local hotel in Palo Alto, Calif. My favorite part was cruising the dealer's room, exploring table after table filled with Star Trek memorabilia. I also discovered that almost half the merchandise was fan-produced. Yes, fans made Star Trek prop replicas. It was the only way you could
get anything, short of making it yourself. I bought an original series communicator kit for $10. I also gained a renewed interest in Star Trek and a new interest in collecting Star Trek merchandise. By the next year, I started my own business and was selling memorabilia at conventions myself. I could find items at flea markets and garage sales to resell. I sold model kits, boxed and built. I even figured out how to make some prop replicas myself. Things were great, both for retailers and fans. Then a national interest in Star Trek was renewed. The 25th anniversary of the original Star Trek series.
Merchandise sold so well that the corporate powers at Paramount sat up and took notice. Much to the chagrin of fans. Up went the licensing fees. Paramount stormtroopers (no relation to Star Wars) began prowling the conventions, shutting down anybody who sold unlicensed merchandise. For a while, model manufacturers and toy makers enjoyed a wide-open market. Merchandise sold like proverbial hotcakes. But if it wasn't licensed, you could no longer find it. Small retailers went out of business (me, too). Mom-and-pop businesses had to shut down.
After a while, the license fees reached a level that left manufacturers with a very slim profit margin. So slim that AMT/Ert, Monogram and Revell no longer make sci-fi models. Playmates no longer makes toys. Star Trek merchandise in local retail stores like Kmart, Target and
Wal-Mart is nonexistent.
About the only thing I can find anymore doesn't seem to be selling. Star Trek DVD sets at twice the price of other shows' DVD sets. That's why I bought the Stargate DVDs instead of the Star Trek DVDs.
Joe Castleberry
joecastleberry(at)netzero.com
agree with Chuck Craig ("Trek DVDs Empty Fan Wallets"). As much as I love all of the Star Trek shows (especially Deep Space Nine), I will not pay $80
for one season of DVDs. I bought every Highlander: The Series DVD set for around $40, which is a fair price. Does Paramount really think people will pay this much for the box sets? I think they would sell a lot more if they reduced the price.
Kennith Perry
kennithp(at)hotpop.com
o Chuck Craig ("Trek DVDs Empty Fan Wallets") and the other grumblers over the price of the Star Trek franchise DVDsnot long ago, before
DVDs became the rage, Star Trek was only available in series form on VHS, at a whopping $24.95 a tape with only TWO episodes a tape! So, you do the mathany price you are paying now for a whole season in one box is a fraction of one season on VHS! In this "more-for-less"
society, you should be thankful for what you are getting now! (Why, at 32, am I sounding like my grandparents?!)
Trek on!
Jonathan Heisey-Grove
jheiseygrove(at)gmail.com
love good science fictionstories which take the human condition, place it in another setting, add some advanced science or unknown psychic abilities, and see how the ethics of the characters evolve in a challenging environment. This is what makes Star Trek, X-Files, Babylon 5 and now Lost fan favorites.
I am intrigued by the many reader theories as to where the characters of Lost are stranded and would like to add my own. I think they passed into another dimension, such as used in many classic sci-fi shows, e.g., Land of the Giants. I also believe that the invisible creature stalking themas well as the strange things they are seeing, such as the polar bearare being created by their own minds, as in the classic Forbidden Planet.
As for being dead, perhaps a reader could help me with the title of a very old black-and-white movie in which all the characters are on a ship at sea and slowly come to realize they are dead and the boat is passage to their ultimate fate. There was also a short story in Amazing Storiesera late 1960sin which space travelers land on a planet and find all their dead relatives, who are being given another chance to restart their lives literally on another world. You don't have to be a member of the religious right to be curious about what happens after death. I don't think making the island Purgatory would ruin the series, but I also think having the characters trapped in another dimension, or lifted to another planet by aliens to become a sort of zoo, etc., would make for more storylines.
I hope we have many, many years of enjoyment as viewers and fans before we come to the end of the Lost mystery, for knowing where the 46 survivors are would mean an end to the series.
TV desperately needs more morality shows that make viewers think, that allow the audience to become involved and ask, "How would I handle that situation?" Let's all hope the TV executives who have given us the tasteless insulting dull dribble of Desperate Housewives will recognize the quality of Lost and not repeat the 1969 decision of NBC.
Gloria Hoffner
Gloriah311(at)aol.com
argot Kidder was right for the role of Lois Lane in the Superman movies, and Teri Hatcher was perfect for Lois & Clark. Now Canadian newcomer Erica Durance will have to prove herself equally worthy for the role of Superman's soulmate opposite Tom Welling's Clark Kent on Smallville. Superman and Lois have always been the quintessential alien-human love story. Now their cosmic bond will be put to the test once again with TV's newest incarnation of this great legacy. I agree that a superhero's conflicted love life makes great drama, with classic romantic tales like Batman and Catwoman, Daredevil and Elektra, Spider-Man and Mary Jane Watson, Hellboy and Liz Sherman or Betty Ross and the Hulk. Superman and Lois Lane is always the epitome, and I shall be looking forward to seeing how Smallville will enhance the complex storyline between Clark and the new Lois for the genre. A superhero's heart is not something to be underestimated.
Michael Anthony Basil
mike.basil(at)sympatico.ca
think the show Scare Tactics is an affront to our personal freedom. To put people in what they believe is a life-or-death situation puts the perpetrators in a position of dominance that cannot be allowed in a free society. Someone that carries a concealed weapon at all times may shoot first to protect others or themselves. They may give no warning prior to shooting. There are many who do not even know of this show. Please stop this show before someone gets killed. Even if the whole thing is a sham, it could cause someone to hesitate in a life-or-death situation because they wrongfully think that they are on the show. Is there no limit to what a few dollars can make you do? People seem to identify with either the victim or the perpetrators. You are only listening to the latter, and ignoring the rights of the former. This is how accidents and deaths happen.
WAKE UP!
Harvey Katz
hkatz(at)pcgus.com
ne year after the airing of the miniseries and only a month before its release on DVD and the premiere of the new, revised TV series on the SCI FI Channel, it's time to finally set into words what I have been thinking for this entire time: Thank you, SCI FI Channel, for resurrecting and revising Battlestar Galactica!
I know hundreds of purists just flinched in horror, but I am deadly serious. If the new series continues with the quality presented in the miniseries, we are in for a wonderful ride. The miniseries is one of the few instances in television history, in my opinion, where the newer version is superior to the original.
Before the purists start sharpening their knives, I hasten to add that I shelled out the money and bought the DVD set of the complete, original series. It was one of those cases that parallel Lost In Space. My memory of the show was far, far better than the reality. While I freely admit that some of the episodes were excellent, the majority of the series was weak and poorly written.
I blame some of that on the times: The FCC was demanding that violence be cut and that family values be pushed to the forefront. There's nothing wrong with this, but it should be interspliced with the storyline and not interfere with the storyline, which it did, time and time again. Yes, Cylons were destroyed with impunity, but they were only robots, not living creatures, right?
The new Galactica slyly references the original series in the miniseries by showing models of the original Cylon Base Stars and even showing a (deactivated) Cylon Warrior (only one of 2 or 3 still in existence), and used the theme from the original Galactica during the decommissioning ceremonies.
The addition of Richard Hatch as a Nelson Mandela-like character in what could be a recurring role is another plus going for the new series and gives it credence. At this writing, only 13 episodes are planned for the new Galactica, but with any luck, and the fact that it will be leading into the Friday night powerhouse one-two punch of Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis, it stands a very good chance of pulling in good numbers.
Before those of you who think I'm certifiable start shooting off venomous e-mails in my direction, why not go back and watch both the original series and the miniseries and catch several episodes of the upcoming new series. Then, if you still cannot contain your rage, feel free to send me your scathing, acidic e-mails.
Somehow, I feel if you wait and watch, I don't think I'll get very many.
Keith Kitchen
boyoklaatu1(at)aol.com
ne of the most underrated series ever, in my opinion, was Space: Above and Beyond. I thought it was a great concept and had pretty good acting and scripts. Where has it gone?
There are no DVDs, no fan sites that I know of and no clamor for more. It was a heck of a lot better than the movie version of Starship Troopers. There was, I believe, some fan frenzy when it was canceled, and then nothing. I would buy a DVD collection of the entire series if I had the chance. Come on Fox, get with it!
Tom Sobieski
tsobieski(at)earthlink.net
hat is the strongest power in all the SF & F universe? What is the omnipotent force against which neither man nor god in science fiction or fantasy stands a chance? SF & F heroes have compiled a compelling and never-ending archive of grand deeds and miraculous quests in every time zone and in every era, close to home and in galaxies far, far away. But there is an eternal entity so irrepressible that it can diminish, demolish and destroy any and every brave hero fighting for truth, justice and, of course, his own good name.
Imagine, if you will ...
One beautiful morning, Mother Nature, in all her glory and full of wrath, appears in the corporate boardroom of Marvel Comics.
"Thieves most foul," she addresses the legendary Bullpen. "You have stolen the word 'spider' from me, a creature I myself named at the beginning the time. 'Spider' in all its forms belongs to me. Continue to use MY Word at your peril!"
The Marvel suits were flabbergasted. What could they do? Their Spider-Man was worth billions, but with one flick of her little finger, Mother Nature could bring forth a gigantic tornado and whisk away their entertainment empire.
"We'll have to think the unthinkable!" decreed the CEO.
"But how?" said a lesser suit. "Everybody knows who Spider-Man is."
"That's how we'll play it," said the CEO. "We'll keep everything about our meal ticket exactly as he is, except ..."
"His comics, his movies, his toys ... all different," said a chorus of Brooks Brothers. "And still the same."
Thus was created a new name only the stockholders could love ... "The Amazing SONY-Man!"
A bit far-fetched? Try reality on for size.
"The ending gong of midnight ... the roar of the airplane engine, at first in the distance ... then stronger as it sounds in a dive ...," his intro blazed across American radio. "This was Captain Midnight!"
Created by Robert M. Burtt and Willfred G. Moore and sponsored by the Skelly Oil Company in 1938, the true-blue Captain Midnight and his Secret Squadron had only begun to fly and fight against the enemies of our country.
The series grew in popularity and was broadcast over the Mutual Network beginning in 1940, sponsored by Ovaltine, a powdery chocolate drink mix, bringing the regional Captain Midnight series to a national audience, complete with exciting premiums purchased with foil tops and labels. Young listeners could join the Secret Squadron by signing up to receive decoder badges. Often the premium played a big part in the series. As a part of the Secret Wing of the Secret Squadron, every listener who got a code-o-graph was encouraged to sign the pledge within the manual.
Eventually, the series moved from radio and comic books to film and finally to television via Columbia Pictures. Once but a stirring audio signal, Captain Midnight had become the straw that stirred 10 million Ovaltine drinks.
Richard Webb, a veteran B-movie pro, got the title role. (Trekkers might remember him as Finney, Kirk's alleged victim in "Court Martial.") Webb delighted viewers with his no-nonsense portrayal, but outraged the sponsor when he refused to drink Ovaltine in public. It was an ill omen; as so often happened with the chocolate-flavored powder, Captain Midnight was headed for hot water.
The half-hour, black-and-white show originally ran on Saturday mornings starting in 1954, but the program proved to be popular with adults and was moved to Monday nights until the network run ended in May, 1956. There was no farewell episode. After all, Captain Midnight was an immortal. Sooner or later, he'd return.
I remember that first time, tuning in to an obvious rerun in the mid-'60s and seeing Webb wearing his cool shirt and his trusty sidekicks exactly as I had known them, but why were they calling my favorite TV hero "Jet Jackson"? Who the heck was "Jet Jackson, Flying Commando"? And what was he doing asking me to join his club, which entitled me to carry a small two-way radio and be in constant communication with him to report any cases of serious crime?
What had happened to Captain Midnight? Was this impersonator a commie trick to take over American TV? What sinister villain had concocted this scheme to corrupt the innocent?
Actually, it was Ovaltine that owned the rights to the Captain Midnight name, and it wasn't giving them up. Not to miss the shot at a quick buck, Columbia simply changed the title and dubbed in "Jet Jackson" anytime someone had once said "Captain Midnight."
Jet Jackson and His Flying Commandos had a deservedly short flight, but left behind a moral to this tale. No matter how brave and courageous the hero, there is one power against which all are helpless victims: the Almighty Dollar.
Kevin Ahearn
kahearn(at)netpub.net
Back to the top.