LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
RECENT LETTERS
* June 16, 1997
* June 2, 1997
* May 19, 1997
* May 5, 1997
* April 21, 1997
* April 7, 1997
* March 24, 1997
* March 10, 1997
* Feb. 24, 1997
* Feb. 10, 1997
* Jan. 24, 1997
* Dec. 16, 1996
* Dec. 2, 1996
* Nov. 18, 1996
* Nov. 4, 1996
* Oct. 21, 1996
* Oct. 7, 1996
* Sept. 23, 1996


Request a review

Letters

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions

The Letters to the Editor department is intended to be a forum for our readers to express their own opinions and ideas. While we appreciate the many complimentary letters we receive each day, you won't find them on this page. Instead, you will find letters that go beyond or even contradict what we have written, letters that offer a different perspective and provide a different view of science fiction. If you would like to submit a letter, please use our feedback form or send a message to scifiweekly@scifi.com.

-- Craig E. Engler, Editor


S:A&B beats insipid Sliders

I find it utterly insulting that The Sci-Fi Channel would seemingly puff out its chest in pride that it has rescued the insipid Sliders from cancellation. Where were you when Fox's vastly superior Space: Above & Beyond hit the trashheap? Don't even try to insinuate that Sliders is anywhere near S:A&B in quality science fiction television -- the proof is in the creators: James Wong has been picked by Chris Carter to replace him on Millenium -- 'nuffsaid.

Tim Simon
timboo@midwest.net


Batman deserved an F

You give Batman & Robin too much credit, even with a D rating. Batman was originally created as a dark character and should always remain a dark character. The '60s TV show did the character a major injustice--and so did this movie.

While I like Arnold Schwarzenegger, the character of Mr. Freeze was badly miscast. Arnold just didn't fit into the role. Robin was represented as being a whiny brat in this movie and just spoiled the mood.

The only character I really liked (other than Alfred, which was a part that was actually written well in this movie) was Batgirl. I liked Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl. She fit the part well--not to mention the costume. The part of Bruce Wayne's girlfriend was mainly window dressing, as was the character of Bane--which is a shame, since Bane deserves a movie with the caped crusader to himself.

I really didn't care all that much for Poison Ivy, though she was probably the best villain in this movie. (Which isn't saying much.) Finally, there was just too much crammed into a two-hour movie--seven different subplots all going on at the same time. (Batman, Robin, Batgirl, Bane, Poison Ivy, Mr. Freeze and having Alfred being sick.)

For the next movie, let's go back and investigate the original Batman movie, which is undoubtedly the best of the lot. It succeeded where this one failed by putting the humor in its place where it was needed and by giving us one memorable villain to remember. (The Joker--brilliantly portrayed by Jack Nicholson.)

And let's lose the campy humor of Adam West's time--not to mention George Clooney as Batman, who also doesn't fit into the role. Batman should be Batman, not Batman the Geek.

My rating? It easily deserves an 'F'!

Carl Riley
spock@macomb.com


Starship Troopers will be a farce

Any film version [of Starship Troopers] that does not contain the battle suits, which are a fundamental part of this short novel, is a profit-minded farce. The ironic thing will be that restructuring the story the way they have will only result in lack of profit. It is unfortunate that the recent boom in science fiction theatrical releases is apparently attributable to the fact that this genre is an optimum vehicle for the wonderful and continually expanding range of computer-generated effects available. Someone looked at this novel and thought what a cool action movie it would make. Even if the philosophy Heinlein presents in the novel (where it is not even expounded upon adequately) is not a significant part of the film, how can they possibly justify not using the suits? Or do they use them? In the previews they are nowhere to be seen. Even when these people are just trying to make a buck they don't do it right. Not to mention that the most recognizable face in a movie with a budget purportedly at $100 million is Michael Ironsides.

DonLP23@aol.com


Stargate novel scoop

There are three Stargate books out. The second and third books are called Rebellion and Retaliation. Ra was one of the nicer Gods. When he wanted something taken care of he released a very nasty female referred to as the Cat. She was the retaliation. Rebellion dealt with the world after Earth people came back to get them to mine the mineral used in the machines. The series didn't introduce the other Gods.

Kent Stewart
kstewart@3-cities.com


Postman isn't Costner's invention

I'm afraid you've lost the attribution for The Postman to David Brin yet again. This is at least the second time I've had to make this comment, but unless it's made clear to your claimed 22,000 readers that this is not an invention of Costner's, but a serious SF novel by a noted writer, many people will get completely the wrong impression.

I must say I'm not impressed!

Dave Clements
clements@ias.fr


John Shirley replies

Just saw for the first time Munro's review of City Come A-Walkin' though the review is probably oldish. Well what the hell, the book is oldish too, even more so. Anyway the only part I'm going to respond to is where she says the book is 'revised' so it's hard to tell if it's prognostications are real -- in fact the book was barely revised. All I did was fix a few of the more juvenile sentences. The book was always first-draft -- I literally wrote The End, put the whole thing in an envelope and immediately mailed it to the editor who bought it and I did this without rereading it. It was a Punk thing, see, but this is of course not the best way to produce a sound book. Still the book has more good than bad about it, like the Sex Pistols LP. I changed none of the story nor did I update anything except I think I took out a reference to computer punch cards and I might have pushed a date or two back. What appears to be prognosticated was prognosticated.

My Eclipse books (which Wired Magazine's Hardwired books is bringing back into print in its cortext series starting with the book Eclipse) are a better example of my more mature cyberpunk writing; or certain stories in The Exploded Heart. Hardwired will be bringing out not only Eclipse but Rudy Rucker's White Light, Bruce Sterling's The Artificial Kid and other seminal books.

John Shirley
www.darkecho.com/JohnShirley.html


Silent Death is heavy on the "piffle"

I can't think of another way of easily getting my comments back to ICE so here goes:


I've been playing Silent Death for five or six years and find the new rules stimulating (especially the Escort Rules) but, in general, heavy on "piffle" background, badly written and full of bugs and typos. I would also say that, whilst the plastic ships are, in general, a neat idea, the bigger metal ships (which could have been usefully manufactured in plastic) are rather heavy and un-wieldy and all are less pleasantly designed than their previous metal incarnations.

Other than all of that, the rules are terrific.

John Treadaway
dave@dids.idiscover.co.uk


DC's Helix is making waves

I've written before about having comic books/graphic novels reviewed in SF Weekly. Perhaps under the Other Cool SF Stuff category. There's a new series out from DC (Helix) called Transmetropolitan that seems to be making waves. It's written by Warren Ellis, an excellent writer who has more than a passing interest in SF and new technology. You can check out his Web site (Smoke Damage) at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/warrenellis/homepage.htm to see what I mean. Perhaps once three or four issues of Transmet are out, (its first issue was just released), you could review it in SF Weekly. Thanks.

Ketan Shah
info@mmstudio.com.sg


Vance is the man

What can I say? Of all the science fiction that I have read and own, I find myself returning time and time and yet time again to read Jack Vance. Thanks for the bibliography, as I see that I have a few gaps in my collection of his works. Wish there were a collection of his short-stories as he is at his wittiest there, especially in his sci-fi detective stories, e.g. the Magnus Ridolf series.

Enjoyed the write-up and thank you for the information! One fine day I hope to meet the Man himself.

Chuck Pommer
cpalmist@airmail.net




Home

News of the Week | Off the Shelf | On Screen | Classic Sci-Fi
Sci-Fi Site of the Week | Anime | Cool Sci-Fi Stuff | Games


Copyright © 1997, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.