Excessive Candour


  Excessive Candour
RECENT COLUMNS
 * To Say Nothing of the Dog
 * The Calcutta Chromosome
 * Expendable
 * The Rise of Endymion
 * Jack Faust, A Geography of Unknown Lands
 * Destiny's Road
 * Eternity Road
 * Lives of the Monster Dogs
 * God's Fire




Request a review

Letters

Gallery

Back issues

Search

Feedback

Submissions

The Staff

Home



Suggestions

Lessons in consequences


By John Clute

The face may be black, the sex may be female, and we may often be told that the buttocks are too large, but the voice is the voice of Benford. After quite a few years of Big Concept novels told in a greyish high-toned voice which bespoke not vastness but vastation, and after a detour (writing as Sterling Blake) into the silly chill of cryonics, Greg Benford has come back, very vigorous, oddly accoutered, but in his own unmistakable voice, to life.

Cosm is set eight years from now, a gap Benford treats as essentially without content: cars, food, fashion, technology, politics, sexual politics, jokes about Mr. Right Now, almost everything remains identical to now; and Benford's comments on California icons and issues and cuisine (as channeled through his extremely obedient protagonist) are clearly addressed directly, without any attempts at SF estrangement, to us in 1998.

(Only real quibble with this: the Cosm cast spends a lot of time trying to stay in--or avoid--communicating with each other; presumably to keep the plot-wires taut, Benford makes these attempts rather more arduous--e-mails and faxes go more ludicrously astray than they do now; telephones ring in empty rooms like film noir film clips shot in the absence of Barbara Stanwyck; etc.--than they really should be. It is, after all, pretty likely that, by 2005, most of us will be far more reachable than now, through the pending introduction of personal codes, which will adhere to us like an electronic tattoo, and access to which will be global.)

Part of the thrill

But it's not quite right to say the 2005 setting is pointless: part of the thrill of Cosm is due to a sense that the physics it describes is theoretically postulable right now, and potentially verifiable (or producible) a few years hence, after the construction of certain experimental facilities. It would be presumptuous for lay readers of the novel (like this reviewer) to declare that the relationship it posits and dramatizes--between theoretical and experimental physics--is precisely cutting-edge, but it feels cutting-edge. The live wire of Cosm feels like a body English of real thought. For its aliveness, for its presentness to the acting of thought, Cosm is a remarkable book.

Alicia Butterworth--a black female experimental physicist at the University of California-Irvine who thinks her ass is too big--is visiting Brookhaven, Long Island, home of the newish Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (or RHIC), which she is using to explore high-velocity collisions between stripped uranium nuclei, in order to duplicate Big Bang conditions by creating "a spitting particle fog called the quark-gluon plasma."

Something happens.

There is an explosion which blows a rift in RHIC; Alicia finds a basketball-sized glowing sphere in the debris, and steals it, heists it back to California, where she (and a theoretical physicist with whom she eventually solves her love problems) works out that what she has "created" is a wormhole periscope into a brand-new universe whose time-scale grows exponentially faster (insofar as our perceptions are concerned) and which goes through an entire multi-billion-year cycle before the novel ends (except for an appendix) with another Bang.

Vivid and disturbing

The concept of the "cosm"--Alicia's coining--is what gives Cosm balls. Benford's portrait of Alicia is both vivid and disturbing. She is vividly believable for stretches of text, usually those stretches in which she is doing physics; but for much of the book our apprehension of her is through an array of likes and dislikes (usually the latter: over and above her own body, which she does forgive after she falls in love, she dislikes the media, lawyers, most men, her father's success, her father's embonpoint, her father's wife, most other physicists, the Friends of the Earth and environmentalists in general, bureaucrats, administrators, other women, feminists, gender politicians, gender studies, academics, parties, sexual advances, being ignored, her therapist, metaphors, the government, dingbat architecture, and California cuisine, to begin with) which is so comprehensive, and so remarkable a potpourri of the blimpish disgruntlements that so tellingly disfigure so many middle-aged Americans of wealth, that one does rather wonder just what Benford is up to here.

Clearly, Alicia is possible: almost anybody is. What she is not, certainly as Benford has depicted her, is remotely probable. The kindliest thing one can say is that she is the kind of woman Robert A Heinlein might have liked, and that Benford may have crafted her as an homage to the Great Man.

Nor is her contempt for the Friends of the Earth--given her theft of a totally unpredictable "cosm" whose energy potentials are totally unknown and potentially (indeed, actually) fatal in their consequences; and her subsequent theft of the rapidly mutating sphere from UCI just when the contemptible old Feds are about to take it out of her hands--really very profoundly argued.

Consequences of a wider sort

Benford himself carefully does not take Alicia's side in describing her various heists, and in tracing her dawning realization that the cosm might end up transmitting into Los Angeles a black-hole burn-out sort of thing. But neither does he contextualize her contempt for the only voices in the text--even though they are only heard from off-stage--which point to consequences of a wider sort than she is willing (or able) to take in.

But then, again, that's the strength of the book. Experimental physicists on the hunt may be loose cannons--certainly that is how Benford depicts them--and may need even sharper lessons in consequences than he metes out to his Alica, who escapes with burn marks, gets her man, gets (it looks like) the chance to make more cosms, and gets famous; but the hunt itself--as Benford depicts it--is astonishingly riveting.

"Nature," he says at one point in what sounds very much like his own voice, "is Data in a fine cloth." More deeply than any other SF novel published in years, Cosm tells us about the weaving of the cloth.


John Clute is a writer, editor, critic and scholar of science fiction. He is the author of the Hugo Award winning Illustrated Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and co-editor of the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, as well as one of the co-founders of the British SF publication Interzone. His criticism and reviews have appeared in The New York Times, the Washington Post, Omni, the Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, and other places too numerous to list. His latest book, Look at the Evidence, was nominated for the 1997 Hugo Award.




Home

News of the Week | Off the Shelf | On Screen | Classic Sci-Fi
Sci-Fi Site of the Week | Anime | Cool Sci-Fi Stuff | Games


Copyright © 1998, Science Fiction Weekly (TM). All rights reserved. Reproduction in any medium strictly prohibited. Maintained by scifiweekly@scifi.com.